Of course, some would argue that there will always be more to say. Technological and scientific breakthroughs will smash through barriers of current intellectual capacity, expanding our knowledge, vocabulary and topical discussions. William Shakespeare, for example, would not have bragged to Ben Jonson about his recent high-score on Angry Birds, on his new iPad 2, or moan to his wife that there’s a power-cut, preventing him from writing his next Tweet. Still, these are hardly the most virtuous, stimulating topics; perhaps all worthwhile subjects have been mined already for those ores of wholesome knowledge.
Still, it is no easy task to write original content. Even now, I am writing about a topic that has been written about and discussed for several years. The best many can hope to achieve is repeating what others have said, and reference it to avoid the minefields of plagiarism. Or, if one is particularly astute, perhaps an ‘innovative’ combination of someone else’s idea with your own could present something in a new light.
The Undergraduate is a hopelessly optimistic character. Constantly buffeted by the theme of this post, the undergraduate’s confidence in his intellect and originality makes it hard for him to accept that he will very rarely come up with something original or worth-while. More likely, he will, to use Virginia Woolf’s metaphor (the fact that I’m quoting, funnily, proves my lack of originality), ‘oar his boat through the reflections [of the river and then] they close again, completely, as if he had never been.’
My pointlessly pessimistic point is that one is unlikely to ever be original. The multiplicity of great minds have already mastered the main subjects of our time, and we can merely study and admire the expertly formulated theories of the great thinkers of our time, such as Newton, Shakespeare, Einstein, Watt, Plato and many others that I do not have the time or knowledge to fittingly acknowledge.